Authority: Understanding Peer Review
Peer Review
Peer review is a process most often used in the publication of scholarly, academic journals. You have likely heard about it from your professors and were perhaps required to use sources that have gone through this process.
It is designed to help weed out research that fails to meet a discipline's standards, has issues with the methodology, or has structural or data analysis problems. It is rigorous, hoping to fix errors before publication. That is partly why these types of sources are credible and authoritative.
Always remember that changes over time might mean something that was peer reviewed could now be out of date, depending on when it was published.
Learn more about the process and how to search for peer-reviewed resources below.
Peer Review and Article Types
- Peer ReviewThis is a document outlying how the peer review process works.
In-Depth Reading on Peer Review
- The limitations to our understanding of peer reviewThis is a journal article that examines our current understanding and limits of peer review. This is for those wishes to understand the process of peer review in greater detail. Page 6 discusses "functionality and quality of peer review".
Searching for Peer-Reviewed Articles
Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
- Ethical guidelines for peer reviewersThis is a pdf that contains a set of guidelines for a peer reviewer. It is intended to give peer reviewers a guide to follow when reviewing scholarly academic peer reviewed journal articles.
Parallels Outside of Academic Publishing: Reddiquette
Though informal, Reddit's guide for the creation of posts parallels the peer-review and publishing processes to underpin the quality of posts. Reddiquette and similar documentation provide creators with a set of suggested guidelines for posts that may include very similar criteria for quality academic research: "keep your submission titles factual and opinion free" and "look for the original source of content", for example.
Just as a researcher would want to publish in the most appropriate journal, Reddiquette recommends posting to the most appropriate community.
As authoritative scholarly communities rely on active participation to continually vet and push forward our knowledge in all disciplines, Reddiquette asks community members to read articles fully, provide constructive criticism and reasoning, and even keep up-to-date by browsing the new submissions page and voting on it.
Simply adhering to such guidelines alone is not enough to guarantee publishing and that your voice is heard, but these are important guides to ensure authoritative information is produced.
You can read more about these parallels in the article "Reddit as an Analogy for Scholarly Publishing and the Constructed, Contextual Nature of Authority."
Image attribution: "reddit sticker - 3" by Eva Blue is licensed under CC BY 2.0
Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.